The lawyers at DJLG litigate high-stakes, patent, antitrust, and other intellectual property cases for both plaintiffs and defendants. DJLG also counsels clients on patent infringement, trade secret, antitrust, licensing, unfair competition and false advertising disputes.

The attorneys at DJLG have been acknowledged as among the top Intellectual Property Trial Lawyers in America by Chambers US, IPLaw 360, Legal 500 US, the Daily Journal and Super Lawyer magazine.  They have obtained numerous trial verdicts over the past several years recovering more than a Billion dollars in verdicts and settlements for their clients.  Some of the verdicts are listed below:

•    Compuware v. IBM – $400 million settlement (following 5-week trial)
•    ActiveVideo v. Verizon – $265 million
•    Alfred Mann Foundation v. Cochlear Corporation – $131 million
•    LG Phillips LCD Co. v. Chunghwa Picture Tube Co. – $53.5 million
•    Fujifilm v. Motorola – $10.25 million

Lawyers in the firm are licensed to practice before the Patent & Trademark Office and have handled Inter Partes Review (IPR), Ex Parte Reexamination, and other patent and trademark prosecution matters.

RECENT REPRESENTATION

Micron Technology, Inc. v. United Microelectronics Corporation, et al.

Dan Johnson Law Group represents United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC), one of the world’s leading semiconductor foundries, headquartered in Taiwan.  On December 5, 2017, UMC was sued by Micron Technologies in the Northern District of California for allegedly misappropriating trade secrets relating to DRAM technology.  In February 2018, Mr. Johnson’s team filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, asserting that Micron’s causes of action relate only to activities that took place in Taiwan, and the Court lacks jurisdiction in California.  Judge Jeffrey S. White entered an order on April 23 finding that Micron’s initial allegations and pleadings had failed to establish a prima facie basis for jurisdiction and allowed limited jurisdictional discovery and supplemental briefing.  The case was transferred to Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 13, 2018 after Judge White recused himself.  The Court set a new hearing on the motion to dismiss for September 21, 2018.  UMC is represented in this matter by Dan Johnson, Mario Moore, and Robert Litts. 

AREAS OF PRACTICE

PATENT CASE STUDIES

View more studies

TRADE SECRET CASE STUDIES

View more studies

COMMERCIAL DISPUTE CASE STUDIES

View more studies

ANTITRUST CASE STUDIES

View more studies